Joe Wilson and Racism

A few days ago, I wrote a post titled “Randall Terry and Joe Wilson: Birds of a Feather.”  I gave my opinion that it seemed obvious that Terry’s tactics during the health care town hall meetings had contributed to Wilson’s outburst.  I also said that Congressional Democrats needed to sanction Wilson, even though President Obama and Nancy Pelosi had said the Democrats should just move on.  And therefore, I was happy this morning to read that there is a vote today on a “resolution of disapproval” for Wilson.  While a “resolution of disapproval,” which is the mildest form of punishment in the House, stops well short of what should have been an investigation that could have shown links between Wilson and other right-wingers (and thus helped Democrats), it is symbolic and far better than doing nothing.

I find it interesting that the CNN.com article on today’s vote makes it sound as if it were the entire Democratic House leadership that changed its mind and decided to move for a simple procedural reprimand against Wilson.  In fact, it is members of the black caucus, led by House Majority Whip James Clyburn of South Carolina, who have caused the vote to happen.  The Washington Post reports that a “racial issue simmers” about the vote:

The vote on punishment will resolve the issue in the House, but behind the incident some see a broader question: Is racism a factor in the way the president is being judged?

With two simple words — “You lie!” — shouted during Obama’s speech to Congress, Wilson helped escalate an issue that has been on a slow burn for weeks, especially among African Americans. Many watched the rancor at last month’s town hall meetings with suspicion that the intense anger among some participants — including signs calling for Obama’s death and a movement questioning his citizenship — was fueled by the fact that a black man sits in the Oval Office.

Led by their most senior black lawmakers, House Democrats decided Monday evening to hold the vote. The decision risks escalating the partisan warfare that has erupted since Wilson’s outburst.

The Post also says:

Clyburn has said behind closed doors that many black voters saw Wilson’s actions as part of the heated rhetoric from conservative activists whose protests, including one on the Capitol grounds Saturday, have included depictions of Obama as Adolf Hitler and the comic-book villain the Joker, according to those attending the meetings. It was one thing to have such remarks at town hall meetings during the summer recess but completely different during a presidential address to a joint session of Congress, Clyburn and other black Democrats argued, and Democrats needed to stand up for the nation’s first black president.Clyburn has not publicly called Wilson’s remark racist, but he told reporters immediately after the speech that Obama is the only president to have been treated in such a manner.

Rep. David Scott of Georgia, who is black, received hate mail from constituents during the August break when the town hall meetings were being held.  He says that Wilson had just returned from the town hall meetings at which the most heated accusations were leveled at Obama and that “I think he was caught up in a moment. The issue is: Would he have done that if the president were white?”  Scott also said that ” few Republicans opposed the ‘level of rhetoric’ against Obama in August and that “We’ve got to realize racism is playing a role here. I’m hopeful that this will be a wake-up call for us to get it off the table.”

The Post also says that:

In a show of defiance Monday, [Wilson] was the first Republican to speak when the chamber opened for a round of brief speeches. Rather than apologizing, Wilson hailed the “patriots” who attended his August town hall forums and opposed a “government takeover” of the health-care system.

Thus, the link between Wilson and the “patriots” who disrupted the town hall meetings is clearer than ever.  Ever since 9/11, I have been extremely wary of any person or group who calls themselves patriots.    In many ways, doing things under the cloak of “patriotism” seems no more than a reason to waive civil liberties and to bring forth more prejudice and discrimination against any group other than white males.

The Southern Poverty Law Center has been monitoring “hate” groups and activity in the United States since the 1980′s.   In 1994, after it says it uncovered links between white supremacist organizations and the “emerging antigovernment ‘Patriot” movement,’ it expanded its monitoring to include militias and other extremist groups. In its latest edition of its “Intelligence Report,” it has an article titled “The Second Wave: Evidence Grows of Far-Right Militia Resurgence.”  It talks about the resurgence of “antigovernment ‘Patriots.’”  It says:

Almost 10 years after it seemed to disappear from American life, there are unmistakable signs of a revival of what in the 1990s was commonly called the militia movement. From Idaho to New Jersey and Michigan to Florida, men in khaki and camouflage are back in the woods, gathering to practice the paramilitary skills they believe will be needed to fend off the socialistic troops of the “New World Order.”

One big difference from the militia movement of the 1990s is that the face of the federal government — the enemy that almost all parts of the extreme right see as the primary threat to freedom — is now black. And the fact that the president is an African American has injected a strong racial element into even those parts of the radical right, like the militias, that in the past were not primarily motivated by race hate. Contributing to the racial animus have been fears on the far right about the consequences of Latino immigration.

If you want to be frightened, you should read the article.  But, specifically as it relates to Joe Wilson, there can be an inference that the “patriots” like Wilson and those who attended his health care debates may either have some racist beliefs themselves or at least are being informed in part by the “Patriots” (with a capital “P”) whose numbers have increased since Obama became President.  If so, there is more to the health care reform opposition than the right-wingers would like you to believe.

9 Responses

  1. [...] about Demint and racism.  And, going back to the allegations of racism in the right-wing’s opposition to health care reform, would it be any wonder if Demint is a [...]

  2. [...] in the Plains, Georgia, home town of former President Jimmy Carter.   In September, there were many accusations made about how Rep. Joe Wilson’s shout of “You lie” during Obama’s speech to Congress were [...]

  3. I’m sorry, but Tom Brady is not a racist! (joke)
    I completely agree with you. And please remember, this isn’t the first time Wilson has outed himself as a racist.

  4. this whole thing cracks me up. Rep. Wilson was wrong for shouting out like that. However, the gentleman apologized. There is no need for anything else. The other thing that bothers me is the fact in this time were there is supposedly a racist faction at work against the president. The only racist faction i really see in congress is the one called the Black caucas. Because you even have one that is racist. We need to get everyone out of office and start over.

  5. The next GOP president should be prepared for rancorous heckling next time he speaks because we all know that truth and politics make strange bedfellows. All’s it takes is one looudmouthed idiot and the precedent is set. WTF would this country do if we elected an Asian….???!!!

    • Let’s remember that this junk happens from both sides now. Were you just as upset when a house representative called President Bush a baby killer on the house floor? Many looked the other way, and stayed silent….thus giving their approval for such lousy conduct from a public official.

      I’m glad they took action with Rep. Wilson. But if it wasn’t politically motivated then why tell him they would drop the reprimand if he apologized on the house floor? Shouldn’t it have gone forth no matter what. He insulted the American people.

      We have got to get back to a level of civility that ruled our politics for hundreds of years. “Disagree all you want, makes jokes of yourself on your time. But when you are in the Capitol building on official business, you you act like rational adults! ” That is what we should tell ALL of our Representives and Senators…not just one side depending on who is in power.

      • Cindy, I agree with you that there should be more civility, no matter which party is in power. But I would think that you would agree with me that what is said on the House floor is far different than hurling a direct insult to the President of the United States on national TV. The House is nowhere close to what goes on in the British parliament, but there are still a lot of outrageous, uncalled-for remarks on the floor.

        And if your remark about “baby killer” is a reference to what Democratic Rep. Pete Stark said on the floor in 1999, I think he referred to a conservative California state welfare director as a baby-killer, not President Bush. (BTW, there was an article recently that said that MSNBC’s Chuck Todd had reported that the Republicans might not want Charlie Rangel to step down because Pete Stark is next in line.)

  6. Wilson needs to take his head and try sticking it up his ass to see if it fits.

  7. Your web site is what Racism is all about. Keeping it alive one site at a time. Your own brand of racism.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 111 other followers