Anti-Choice: The Catholic Church vs. Rep. Patrick Kennedy (Part 2)

On October 28, I wrote about how the issue of abortion is pitting the Catholic Church against Rep. Patrick Kennedy. Kennedy had criticized the church’s opposition to health care reform legislation and now, over the weekend, voted against the Stupak amendment that barred the use of federal funds from paying for most abortions.

After the vote, Bishop Thomas Tobin, who had previously ripped Kennedy’s support of abortion choice, issued a public letter to Kennedy that went even further.  Tobin essentially wrote that Kennedy cannot be a member of the church because he supports abortion.  In addition, Tobin said Kennedy’s actions “raise[] an important question: What does it mean to be a Catholic?”  This letter is remarkable in its officiousness and obliviousness to what is going on in the real word.  The last paragraph is particularly infuriating.  Why anyone would put “faith” in someone like Tobin is beyond me.  I quote below the text of the letter that appears on the Catholic Culture web site.  I welcome any comments you may have.

[W]hen someone rejects the teachings of the Church, especially on a grave matter, a life-and-death issue like abortion, it certainly does diminish their ecclesial communion, their unity with the Church. This principle is based on the Sacred Scripture and Tradition of the Church and is made more explicit in recent documents …

But let’s get down to a more practical question; let’s approach it this way: What does it mean, really, to be a Catholic? After all, being a Catholic has to mean something, right?

Well, in simple terms – and here I refer only to those more visible, structural elements of Church membership – being a Catholic means that you’re part of a faith community that possesses a clearly defined authority and doctrine, obligations and expectations. It means that you believe and accept the teachings of the Church, especially on essential matters of faith and morals; that you belong to a local Catholic community, a parish; that you attend Mass on Sundays and receive the sacraments regularly; that you support the Church, personally, publicly, spiritually and financially.

Congressman, I’m not sure whether or not you fulfill the basic requirements of being a Catholic, so let me ask: Do you accept the teachings of the Church on essential matters of faith and morals, including our stance on abortion? Do you belong to a local Catholic community, a parish? Do you attend Mass on Sundays and receive the sacraments regularly? Do you support the Church, personally, publicly, spiritually and financially?

In your letter you say that you “embrace your faith.” Terrific. But if you don’t fulfill the basic requirements of membership, what is it exactly that makes you a Catholic? Your baptism as an infant? Your family ties? Your cultural heritage?

The prelate concluded:

[I]n confronting your rejection of the Church’s teaching, we’re not dealing just with “an imperfect humanity” – as we do when we wrestle with sins such as anger, pride, greed, impurity or dishonesty. We all struggle with those things, and often fail.

Your rejection of the Church’s teaching on abortion falls into a different category – it’s a deliberate and obstinate act of the will; a conscious decision that you’ve re-affirmed on many occasions. Sorry, you can’t chalk it up to an “imperfect humanity.” Your position is unacceptable to the Church and scandalous to many of our members. It absolutely diminishes your communion with the Church.

Congressman Kennedy, I write these words not to embarrass you or to judge the state of your conscience or soul. That’s ultimately between you and God. But your description of your relationship with the Church is now a matter of public record, and it needs to be challenged. I invite you, as your bishop and brother in Christ, to enter into a sincere process of discernment, conversion and repentance. It’s not too late for you to repair your relationship with the Church, redeem your public image, and emerge as an authentic “profile in courage,” especially by defending the sanctity of human life for all people, including unborn children. And if I can ever be of assistance as you travel the road of faith, I would be honored and happy to do so.

 

 

4 Responses

  1. since when is it a crime to stand up for what one believes in? Kennedy has taken his stance on abortion, he has a right to do that, however, the church also has a right to ask him not to partake in ceremonies that it’s members hold dear because he does not share the same beliefs. Good for Tobin for taking a stand. One side of an issue should not be allowed to overrun the other simply because one side is louder. Both have the right to individual opinions and beliefs as well as the right to speak publicly regarding such.

    • Sarah, I agree with your statement that “One side of an issue should not be allowed to overrun the other simply because one side is louder.” Do you agree that the anti-health care and anti-abortion messages from the summer town hall meetings on health care were allowed by the news media to overrun the less noisy messages on the reasons for health care reform? Were you against the anti-health care and anti-abortion messages?

  2. [...] taken the next step in his escalating war against Patrick Kennedy and abortion. (See my most recent post on Tobin and Kennedy.)  According to an interview with Kennedy published today in the Providence [...]

  3. [...] I’ve had a lot of negative things to say about the Catholic Church–my latest being this.  And Emily wrote earlier today about the church’s political heavy-handedness in the health [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 111 other followers