Sarkozy’s Prejudice Against Muslims

This blog has, on a number of occasions, discussed French President Nicolas Sarkozy’s support for a proposed ban on women wearing burqas in all public places.  (For example, see this most recent post about a statement by the French Immigration Minister.)  Emily and I have disagreed about the proposed ban.  I wrote that enacting such a ban was a positive step for women’s rights, even though it was clear that the proposal was intended as a means of slowing the growth of the Muslim population.  Emily wrote that such a ban would be anti-Islam rather than pro-woman.

I still believe that banning burqas would be a positive step for women’s rights.  However, in Sarkozy’s latest statements about about the Muslim population, he does not even attempt to put any spin on his beliefs and there are no positive steps that could come from his statements.  Simply put, Sarkozy is blatantly prejudiced against Muslims.

Voicing sympathy for the recent move by the Swiss to ban minarets, he warned French Muslims to practice their religion discreetly: “Christians, Jews, Muslims, all believers regardless of their faith, must refrain from ostentation and provocation and … practice their religion in humble discretion.”  However, it was clear that his statements were specifically directed to Muslims, since he wrote that anything that could appear as a challenge to France’s Christian heritage and republican values would “doom to failure” a moderate Islam in France.  According to Sarkozy, this “discretion” must be done in order to preserve France’s “national identity.”

Many French agree with Sarkozy.  The article in the Times Online says that Sarkozy enjoys “majority public support” for his beliefs that Muslim women should be banned from wearing burqas in public. (Parliament may propose an outright ban next month.)  And a recent survey found that 46 per cent favored banning minarets, with 40 per cent against.   And more than 40 per cent opposed building any mosques at all, with only 19 per cent in favor.

There are other French officials, of course, who are vociferously opposed to Sarkozy’s stance on French Muslims.  But Sarkozy’s stance, combined with apparent support by many French citizens, and with the Swiss ban on minarets, show that there are some truly frightening things going on in Europe.  The Times Online article includes this paragraph on how a French official is even trying to say that keeping true to a “national identity” is so important that, if not done, it could lead to another Hitler situation:

The left-leaning intellectual world was also appalled when Adolf Hitler was brought into the debate by Christian Estrosi, the Industry Minister. “If on the eve of the Second World War, the German people had taken the time to asked themselves upon what German identity was based … then perhaps we would have been able to avoid the … shipwreck of European civilisation,” he said.

Yes, some truly frightening things are going on in Europe.

6 Responses

  1. [...] multiple times on the French move to ban the wearing of the burqa.  (For instance, see this and this and this.)  The final decision has not yet been made.  The Guardian has yes-no opinions by Mona [...]

  2. [...] proposal to ban the wearing of a burqa in all public places.  (For instance, see these posts in December and October.)   Emily and I have disagreed about the proposed ban.  I wrote that enacting such a [...]

  3. [...] Joins Debate Over the Burqa Posted on January 18, 2010 by Mike In my last post about French President Nicolas Sarkozy’s support for a proposed ban on women wearing burqas in [...]

  4. Excuse me, but as far as I’m concerned, there is no justification whatsoever for defending any society, religion, political party or ethos that includes the subjugation of women and their treatment as chattel as any part of its basis. I don’t care what the basis of Sarkozy’s prejudice is, I agree with him that French and other civilized nations’ freedoms and values must be protected. Do you really want our country to become like Iran or Yemen? Have we become democratic only to flee from the epiphanies of the Age of Enlightenment? Freedom means that all people are equal under the law, and whether Catholic, Muslim, Mormon, Jewish or whatever, unjust traditions or simple misogyny, racism, etc. must have no refuge. Decades after the supposed end of legal slavery in the world, millions of women are living in slavery. There is no moral position that can justify the treatment of millions of women in the world today as slaves.

  5. Thanks for the comment. I’m also afraid that there will be bloodshed.

  6. This man is truly abject. I wrote an article at the time of the “burqa affair”, and the last weeks in France just prove I was — very sadly — right.

    There is not one day without one of Sarkozy watchdogs publicly insulting Arabs. From bashing by the Police to ministers and party mates claiming loud that “one [Arab] is OK, but it becomes a real problem when there are more”, the last pearl came in the filthy mouth of the Minister of Family N. Moreno, yesterday.
    She said that to her, a “good Arab must speak decent French and wear his baseball hat straight!”. We obviously all know how an offensive islamic symbol it is to wear a baseball hat..!
    This French government and the ugly king at its throne are a very dangerous venom. They won’t stop until bloodshed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 111 other followers